Hiya all
I am looking at buying a laptop to work as a travelling workstation, for 3d modelling and animation..
I have heard great things about Hypersonic, and am looking at the EX7 in particular..
Here are some specs I am thinking of:
2GB RAM
Quadro FX GO
2x 60GB 7200 RPM Drives
either 3.6Ghz P4 560, OR 3.4Ghz P4 650 (with EM64T)
I have a few questions though - regarding mainly whether to go 64 bit, and the screen resolutions..
I would be looking at using more than 2GB of RAM in these machines (I am buying a few of em..) in prolly 8months to a years time - and I know that regular machines don't really handle more than 2GB (or it is a waste putting more in)....
If I go 64Bit on this machine, is all 4GB (when I upgrade) used, or does the motherboard only really use 2.8GB for applications, and the rest for "hardware" ?
also - screen resolution..
I have never worked off a 17" laptop before and was wondering what screen res was best... Normally, I think higher is better - however, is 1900x1200 just too darn high-res to see stuff effectively? If anyone has experience that would be great
Cheers!
Matt
I am looking at buying a laptop to work as a travelling workstation, for 3d modelling and animation..
I have heard great things about Hypersonic, and am looking at the EX7 in particular..
Here are some specs I am thinking of:
2GB RAM
Quadro FX GO
2x 60GB 7200 RPM Drives
either 3.6Ghz P4 560, OR 3.4Ghz P4 650 (with EM64T)
I have a few questions though - regarding mainly whether to go 64 bit, and the screen resolutions..
I would be looking at using more than 2GB of RAM in these machines (I am buying a few of em..) in prolly 8months to a years time - and I know that regular machines don't really handle more than 2GB (or it is a waste putting more in)....
If I go 64Bit on this machine, is all 4GB (when I upgrade) used, or does the motherboard only really use 2.8GB for applications, and the rest for "hardware" ?
also - screen resolution..
I have never worked off a 17" laptop before and was wondering what screen res was best... Normally, I think higher is better - however, is 1900x1200 just too darn high-res to see stuff effectively? If anyone has experience that would be great

Cheers!
Matt





I have the 1680x1050 version, however, I am running it at 1280x960. The higher resolution for me just seems to make my eyes hurt. So I found a comfortable setting that did not distort everything. Mostly this is for text related reading. My laptop screen is about two feet from my face, thus my problem.
