Originally Posted by tntoak
Then you didn't comprehend the post. When Japan and the EU have both come to similar conclusions reragding Intel's practices as what AMD is alluding to in the complaint, why it is pointless? When the former CEO of Compaq, as well as Gateway's current CEO, have gone on record as stating that Intel effectively set max quotas regarding how many AMD PCs they could sell, how is that discussion pointless? Intel has abused its position to artificially limit the impact AMD could have upon the market. In my book, that's a deliberate abuse of market position.
Umm no your post came off as you being a condescending ass maybe a grammar class or seven