NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Acer Forums › Acer Notebook Benchmarks › Ferrari 4000...post your benchmarks!!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Ferrari 4000...post your benchmarks!! - Page 4

post #61 of 116
7/18/05 at 3:06am
Quote:
Originally Posted by techn9ne
the infineon RAM has the same timings of my nanya ram... same speed... same size... a different brand should not make a 10 second difference...
yes, that's what I thought, but my friend's Ferrari has make these scores. and if you think that a turion 1.6 makes 51s, the score of the ferrari 4000 with a turion 2.0 is right! what kind of chipset have yours ferraris? I think it's the same.
Reply
Reply
post #62 of 116
7/18/05 at 7:04am
Quote:
Originally Posted by techn9ne
the infineon RAM has the same timings of my nanya ram... same speed... same size... a different brand should not make a 10 second difference...
I have excactly the same CPU, same RAM, same timings at that Italian guy. We get similar 3DMark05 score. But his ferrari apparently uses 20% less time for calculating of 1M superpi than mine does. Could other ferrari4000 owners please post their 1M superpi scores? (superpi is not malware as opposed to batteryeater 2.6 - that crashed my machine.)

Get superpi at http://superpi.radeonx.com
Reply
Reply
post #63 of 116
7/18/05 at 10:47am
my PCMARK05 score was 2549... which is HIGHER than his score. That just doesn't make sense at all. It's impossible for his super-pi to be that much higher when my 3DMARK05 and PCMARK05 scores are both slightly higher.
Reply
Reply
post #64 of 116
7/19/05 at 2:28am
Quote:
Originally Posted by techn9ne
my PCMARK05 score was 2549... which is HIGHER than his score. That just doesn't make sense at all. It's impossible for his super-pi to be that much higher when my 3DMARK05 and PCMARK05 scores are both slightly higher.
his score in pcmark05 is 2590. this before to convert fyle system in ntfs and before to close all the application: he did make 38s in superpi, the after all 36s. I think his ferrari can make much more of 2600.
but ten second in superpi is very very much strange
bytheway, another guy has bought the ferrari here.. he'll make a 1M superpi, so we can understand what's happening
Reply
Reply
post #65 of 116
7/19/05 at 6:35am
Quit talking about the NTFS conversion - that does nothing for the CPU scores!!

Can you get the BIOS version from the guy with the superpi 1M score 36 seconds?
Reply
Reply
post #66 of 116
7/19/05 at 7:21am
Quote:
Originally Posted by wombatten
Quit talking about the NTFS conversion - that does nothing for the CPU scores!!

Can you get the BIOS version from the guy with the superpi 1M score 36 seconds?
yes, I know, don't worry. don't care about my bad english, I know how a computer works infact I've also mentioned "close all the background application"

ok, I'll ask for the bios version
Reply
Reply
post #67 of 116
7/20/05 at 2:10pm
bios version: 3A19 --> 6/07/2005

yours?
Reply
Reply
post #68 of 116
7/22/05 at 1:36am
we really need to figure this out
Reply
Reply
post #69 of 116
7/22/05 at 10:43am
now I'm waiting for the scores of an another guy who bought a ferrari 4000
Reply
Reply
post #70 of 116
7/23/05 at 8:38pm
Here you go, I have no idea what this program does.. nor have any idea what the numbers mean.

I downloaded, chose 1M digits and printscreened.



Forgot to close Opera, maybe I would've gotten better scores... I dunno.. let me know if you want another test.

Also ran a 3dmark05 and got 2337, dont really care much for these test. I love this notebook and I havent had a single problem running any games yet.
It's hella fast compared to my old Elitegroup 551
Reply
Reply
post #71 of 116
7/24/05 at 11:31am
WLF46WLF - I have BIOS version 3A17. Don't know if the newer BIOS has an effect on superpi scores. I'll try to upgrade mine.

Drublic - Although I cannot see the final time for the superpi I believe your score is approximately the same as mine. Superpi 1M calculates pi (3.141592....) with an accuracy of 1 million decimals.
Reply
Reply
post #72 of 116
7/24/05 at 12:51pm
Opened SuperPi again and my 1M result says 47.594
Reply
Reply
post #73 of 116
7/24/05 at 4:38pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by wombatten
WLF46WLF - I have BIOS version 3A17. Don't know if the newer BIOS has an effect on superpi scores. I'll try to upgrade mine.

Drublic - Although I cannot see the final time for the superpi I believe your score is approximately the same as mine. Superpi 1M calculates pi (3.141592....) with an accuracy of 1 million decimals.
I don't know if those scores were because of the newer bios.. I've never heard a bios that gives that gap! I'm still waiting for other italian ferrari 4000 score..
Reply
Reply
post #74 of 116
7/24/05 at 4:56pm
ok, here are mine ferrari4005wlmi scores:
48.062 secs.
Reply
Reply
post #75 of 116
7/24/05 at 7:34pm
Hi all,

I was reading another thread and saw a Ferrari 4000 without sse3 (Linux doesn't show sse3 as cpu flag) and in this thread there is a screenshot of cpu-z showing sse3 as cpu flag. I suspect some Turions on Ferraris lack sse3 instructions and others don't. Could you check in cpu-z if all your Turions really have sse3? The lack of sse3 can make that 10 seconds difference in super pi.
Reply
Reply
post #76 of 116
7/24/05 at 8:44pm
they would all have SSE3

and yes CPU-Z repots mine as having SSE3... and I get around 48 seconds
Reply
Reply
post #77 of 116
7/25/05 at 3:46am
do cpu-z recognise your cpu as a turion?

here it don't
Reply
Reply
post #78 of 116
7/25/05 at 10:43am
umm.... according to that second screenshot of Super-Pi scores that you posted the CPU-Z says that it's a Turion ML-37... so it does recognise it. So what are you talking about?
Reply
Reply
post #79 of 116
7/25/05 at 11:01am
no, sorry!! RMClock, not cpu-z
Reply
Reply
post #80 of 116
7/25/05 at 4:24pm
ah... I don't think my RMClock recognized the Turion... I will check later for sure though.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Acer Notebook Benchmarks
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Acer Forums › Acer Notebook Benchmarks › Ferrari 4000...post your benchmarks!!