NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Asus Notebook Forums › Asus Notebook Benchmarks › Benchmarks: Asus Z71V 3DMARK03 Scores only!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Benchmarks: Asus Z71V 3DMARK03 Scores only!

post #1 of 21
7/3/05 at 4:18pm
Thread Starter 
Just post your rig and your scores... include your clock speed.

mine:

250/500:


300/600:



Mobile Celeron 1.4 @ 1.86MHz
40GB WD 5400RPM 8MB Cache
1024MB OCZ DDR2 Memory
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 21
7/3/05 at 5:44pm
Just kinda curious how come your not running 3dmark05?
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 21
7/3/05 at 5:49pm
Hey, why not?

Stock speeds (250/500):



Overclocked (300/600):



Keep in mind, nothing else is overclocked. These were all run at 1024x768 on the default settings. I'm curious though... I'm going to try running them at the native 1680x1050 resolution.

EDIT: Ha, at 1680x1050, I got 2720 stock speeds, and 3138 overclocked to 300/600.
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 21
7/3/05 at 7:03pm
How does a guy with a 1.4 GHz Pentium M beat one with a 1.86 GHz Pentium M? Two guys, actually, I think - I'll double-check my scores once I'm done calibrating my battery.
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 21
7/3/05 at 7:10pm
Thread Starter 
actually mine was a 1.4 Celeron 1MB cache cpu... :s i think 2003 is more approptiate and i don't feel like installing a 150MB+ program.
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 21
7/3/05 at 7:18pm
A 1.4 Celeron beating a 1.86 Pentium M with stock video settings? O_O
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 21
7/3/05 at 7:39pm
Thread Starter 
well... i played with the grapihcs setting.. plus mine is running at 1.86 also.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 21
7/3/05 at 7:42pm
Silly of me. Didn't notice that you had overclocked.

Interesting, though - the cache only seems to make enough difference to help when the graphics card's power increases.
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 21
7/3/05 at 7:50pm
We were doing the graphics tests--not the CPU tests. In the Game Demos 1-4, the emphasis is on the graphics card, not the processor.

I don't understand how you got a higher score for the stocked settings, but I got a higher score with the same overclocked settings.
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 21
7/3/05 at 7:51pm
Thread Starter 
the cache in mobile socket 479's are awesome
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 21
7/3/05 at 7:54pm
Keep in mind, overclocking my processor would put it at 2.4ghz. O:-)
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 21
7/3/05 at 7:56pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redmumba
Keep in mind, overclocking my processor would put it at 2.4ghz. O:-)

unfortunately.. plus you have a prebuilt book
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 21
7/3/05 at 8:24pm
My lappy:
Pentium M 1.86 GHz (533 MHz FSB)
1024 MB PC4200 (512x2) (Samsung, I believe.)
GeForce Go 6600 128 MB (just like everyone else.)

My scores:

Stock settings


Overclocked - 275/500


It crashed during the CPU tests at 300/600.
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 21
7/3/05 at 8:47pm
Thread Starter 
do this.....

go to your graphics settings and do the following

1. turn off antialiasing(tick off application controlled first)
2. turn off anisotropic(tick off application controlled first)
3. setting image setting to high performance rather than high quality
4. turn vert sync off (tick off application controlled first)

once you do these things run the benchmark aagain and see what results you will get.
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 21
7/3/05 at 9:15pm
CPU @ 2.13GHz, Go 6600 @ 310/650

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4054696
Reply
Reply
post #16 of 21
7/3/05 at 11:36pm
The high performance settings seem to yield a 100-200 difference. I've propped my notebook up higher, so I'll again be an idiot and play the "dangerous frequencies" game.

Yeah. Stock settings went up to 4707, overclocked up to 5138 or something. And even with my notebook set up in what should be an even better thermal position, it still screwed up on the CPU tests (Yes, I know that seems odd.) at 300/600.
Reply
Reply
post #17 of 21
7/4/05 at 12:43pm
prince, they're controlled BY 3DMark, so its not like they're going to be on. Anyways, I want to put some AS5 or one of those thermal pads on the GPU so I can cool it down! ;_;

EDIT: Yuri, what is this optimal cooling solution? O:-)
Reply
Reply
post #18 of 21
7/4/05 at 12:49pm
I lifted the ass of my notebook. The attempt at improving it was lifting the notebook higher.

And I'll point out that the High Performance Settings did seem to cause a noticeable drop in image quality.
Reply
Reply
post #19 of 21
7/4/05 at 2:09pm
It is also important to post the version of nvidia driver you are using. Each version have different effects.
Reply
Reply
post #20 of 21
7/12/05 at 4:07pm
Is there a consensus on which drivers are yield the best performace yet reliable?
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Asus Notebook Benchmarks
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Asus Notebook Forums › Asus Notebook Benchmarks › Benchmarks: Asus Z71V 3DMARK03 Scores only!