New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Mobility Video Benchmarks! - Page 2

post #21 of 43
7/12/05 at 12:56am
Quote:
Also, spk, could you run those benchmarks with 4XAA and then 4XAA/8X Aniso for the 80.40 Beta drivers? At all three clock speeds?
How? The freeware version of 3Dmark05 doesn't allow me to change the setting. So all of those benches are based upon the default setting of 3DMark05
Reply
Reply
post #22 of 43
7/12/05 at 1:05am
Thread Starter 
Hey, its only $20... or you could always search around for alternative means.
Reply
Reply
post #23 of 43
7/12/05 at 1:09am
Quote:
Originally Posted by smilepak
How? The freeware version of 3Dmark05 doesn't allow me to change the setting. So all of those benches are based upon the default setting of 3DMark05

In the ATi Control Panel you can set the AA/AF levels for all your applications. You should be able to just set 4X AA/AF and run 3D Mark. That's what I've always done.
Reply
Reply
post #24 of 43
7/12/05 at 2:04am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redmumba
Yeah, but it just doesn't look very good...
It's not very hard to make an excel graph pretty. Look around the web for a tutorial or take one at your local community college. I've been using excel since high school and high still use it in college it's part of my physics curriculum.
Reply
Reply
post #25 of 43
7/12/05 at 3:19am
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck232
In the ATi Control Panel you can set the AA/AF levels for all your applications. You should be able to just set 4X AA/AF and run 3D Mark. That's what I've always done.

True, I forgot about that. There is application setting vs override setting. I'll see if I could run a few test tomorrow.
Reply
Reply
post #26 of 43
7/13/05 at 10:50pm
Man you should look in the Sager forum. The person who got the Sager 3880 was able to get close to 3000 on the Nvidia 6600 in 3DMark05!


Also here are the data you wanted


Official NVIDIA GO 6600 Website
http://www.nvidia.com/page/go_6600.html

Memory Interface 128-bit
Memory Bandwidth (GBps) 11.2 GBps
Fill Rate (pixels/sec.) 3 billion
Vertices/Second 300 million
RAMDACs 400 MHz



********************************************
nVidia GO 6600 GPU Performance Test
********************************************
*Note:
* All test based upon Asus Z71V nVidia GO 6600
* Asus Z71V STOCK SETTING IS: 250/500
* Toshiba used GO 6600 TC, which is slower
than one used in Asus Z71V

nVidia Driver v71.13
* Asus Stocked Video Driver
3D Mark 2005: 1720 (250/500 Stocked Setting)
3dMark 2005 2018 (275/563)

nVidia 80.40 Beta Leaked
* AA OFF, Resolution 1024x768
3DMark05: 1821 (250/500 stocked setting)
3DMark05: 2121 (290/575 OC Setting)
3DMark05: 2236 (300/600 OC Setting)

* AA 2x, Resolution 1024x768
3DMark05: 1813 (250/500 stocked setting)
3DMark05: 1975 (290/575 OC Setting)
3DMark05: 2072 (300/600 OC Setting)

* AA 4x, Resolution 1024x768
3DMark05: 1523 (250/500 stocked setting)
3DMark05: 1733 (290/575 OC Setting)
3DMark05: 1817 (300/600 OC Setting)
Reply
Reply
post #27 of 43
7/14/05 at 3:14pm
Thread Starter 
Thanks a bunch! But since you don't see them updated, you must be wondering why, right? I'm actually making a database! I figured, what would be easier? Me having to manually update the graphs everytime, or having a script that can provide it a bit more dynamically? Eh? 8) No ETA, but I've setup the database and _manually_ entered the results. I figure it'll grow as it does... ;D
Reply
Reply
post #28 of 43
7/15/05 at 1:55am
it all just depends on the clockspeed. the people have said that the x700 is a bit more powerful than the go 6600, but the 6600 on the sager 3880 can be clocked WAY higher than the x700 on the z71v.the ferrari 4000's x700 is probably clocked higher than the z71v as well.

my friend has a 15.4 inch screen with WUXGA. it looks small to me, but he loves it
Reply
Reply
post #29 of 43
7/15/05 at 2:45am
Thread Starter 
That's quite wrong. Just look at the benchmarks; the X700 is easily faster than the 6600 both in specs and practice. Even at minimal overclocking (The X700 is underclocked at 350/350 in the Travelmate 8100) to 420/400 yields much better results in 3DMark05.
Reply
Reply
post #30 of 43
7/15/05 at 1:46pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redmumba
That's quite wrong. Just look at the benchmarks; the X700 is easily faster than the 6600 both in specs and practice. Even at minimal overclocking (The X700 is underclocked at 350/350 in the Travelmate 8100) to 420/400 yields much better results in 3DMark05.
You haven't see the Sager 3880 nvidia 6600 then. Someone got theirs close to 3000 on 3DMark05 easy. ..
Reply
Reply
post #31 of 43
7/15/05 at 1:49pm
Thread Starter 
Yeah, but look at the MX700 that Jfergara posted. 350/350 to 420/400 (a very minimal overclock) yields almost 2900 on the X700--and I'm sure you can overclock it even more. Again, the difference isn't that great, but the X700 still nudges out the 6600...
Reply
Reply
post #32 of 43
7/15/05 at 2:27pm
http://www.notebookforums.com/showthread.php?t=80992

The X700 and 6600 are fairly similar in performance when in a similar chassis. The Z71v's 6600 is pretty sad. The 6600 gets a lot more out of overclocking than the X700, as well.
Reply
Reply
post #33 of 43
7/15/05 at 2:54pm
If I go crazy this week, I might be able to promise a 3000 on 3dmark05.

(Crazy as in buying another stick of DDR2 module to match my 1 gig and tweaking the computer for a couple of hours setting up the laptop maximum performance. Also I might have to prepare some sacrificial bannana's for the 3000 3dmark05 trek. No promises though I'm kinda busy...)
Reply
Reply
post #34 of 43
7/27/05 at 5:26pm
sticky 4 u
Reply
Reply
post #35 of 43
12/2/05 at 7:01pm

3D Mark 05 score

I get a score of 2479 (highest of three runs)

CPU score is 3438

The system is:

MSI-1029, TURION MT-40, 1024 megs corsair XMS, X700/128, XP PRO, 80 gig/5400 rpm

Default settings for 3DMARK and the X700 - running the latest OMEGA drivers - 2.6.75a

--Sam
Reply
Reply
post #36 of 43
12/2/05 at 9:57pm

Overclocked results

I overclocked the video core and memory a bit with atitool/5.11 catalyst drivers @ 400 core 340 memory and got a 2721 score with 3895 cpu marks.

--Sam
Reply
Reply
post #37 of 43
12/15/05 at 4:09am
Hey all, I got an x700 lappy just recently, and thought I would share my results after my first try at OCing / benching it

2952 marks, with a Toshiba M70-144 (x700 256MB @ 400/364 - P-M 1.733)

Here is my compare: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1562132
Reply
Reply
post #38 of 43
12/15/05 at 10:56am
My new Sager 5720 (1920x1200), gave me 6673 points on 3DMARK2005.

Is this good ? (Not kidding...I am new testing GPUs... )

Mine is a Sager 5720 Geforce 7800GTX 256 Video RAM, 1GB RAM, WUXGA 1920x1200 Screen. (a VERY good machine !!!!) I am so happy with it.

BTW : This is my first message on this forum. I am searching other Sager Users to talk about it.
Good to be here.
Reply
Reply
post #39 of 43
12/16/05 at 7:12am
Remember guys not all x700's are made equal.

The ones on the Z70Va's seem to clock the lowest, while the sager's modular x700 with 256mb vram and Acer's x700's seem to clock higest.

Too bad for us Asus owners
Reply
Reply
post #40 of 43
12/16/05 at 12:44pm
my x300 128M can even reach 1802 on 3dmark05

are you sure x700 only in 2000-ish region ?
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Other Brand Notebook Reviews