Originally Posted by shoman24v
Does the konfabulator use less CPU then the Desktop X one?
That I'm not sure about. I tried DesktopX originally, and then tried Konfabulator and just enjoyed their widgets a little more. I noticed the perfmon sets of widgets generating those little cpu spikes on both programs, but I didn't really compare them closely.It's worth playing around with the other widgets though because not all of them behave that way. According to the konfabulator devs, kon isn't supposed to be any more resource intensive compared to desktopx (stardock), but I think some of the earlier versions used slightly more memory.