New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

3DMark05: Highest for x6000

post #1 of 9
8/3/05 at 1:23am
Thread Starter 
Just wanted to know the max capacity for the Radeon Mobility X600 on either the ZD8000 or X6000. I was able to get 2124 in 3DMark05 with core at 475MHz and memory at 333MHz (no artifacts). Was using Omega 2.6.53 (Catalyst 5.7) drivers.
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 9
8/3/05 at 12:41pm
2124 is pretty damn high
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 9
8/10/05 at 4:21pm
I'm sorry, I'm still newbish, but I've been hearing lots about 3DMark05 with a set of numbers without units next to it... Is this like a framerate tester or something? Hell, I'll just go google it..
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 9
8/10/05 at 7:41pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fr3nZy
Just wanted to know the max capacity for the Radeon Mobility X600 on either the ZD8000 or X6000. I was able to get 2124 in 3DMark05 with core at 475MHz and memory at 333MHz (no artifacts). Was using Omega 2.6.53 (Catalyst 5.7) drivers.
That's probal ythe most a x600 can get... the stock scores are like 1200 - 1500 lol
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 9
8/11/05 at 3:11am
does the driver matter when gettin the most out of the video card? is using an omega driver better than using the one HP has on there website? sorry, im kinda a newbie tryna learn some things too
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 9
8/11/05 at 6:27pm
WoW, is there that much differance between the x600 and Geforce 6800 Ultra?

Sager and dell forums have people posting scores 5000+ and i've seen a couple in the low 6000 range.......

I know nothing about these benchmark scores, but does say a computer that scores a 4000 twice as "good" as one that only scores a 2000?
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 9
8/11/05 at 9:43pm
The driver definitely matters. If you'll look for posts by smilepak, he's been testing out the Nvidia 6600 Go on his Z71V, and he shows the gradual progression of everything from the official drivers, to the notebook's drivers, to tweaked drivers. Although this was on an nVidia card, I'm sure it applies in the same way to the X600.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 9
8/12/05 at 8:40pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostbane
WoW, is there that much differance between the x600 and Geforce 6800 Ultra?

Sager and dell forums have people posting scores 5000+ and i've seen a couple in the low 6000 range.......

I know nothing about these benchmark scores, but does say a computer that scores a 4000 twice as "good" as one that only scores a 2000?
3DMark05 is a benchmark for graphic processing (maybe a little CPU), so no, just because a computer scores 4000 over 2000 does not mean it is twice as good as the 2000. It does, however, mean that the graphics card is twice as better. For instance, an x600 probably does around 1500 stock. An x700 does around 3000 stock (i believe), and this is because an x700 has twice as many pipelines as an x600. Even though a Dell XPS2 whoops the shit out of my notebook in 3DMark05, I'd bet money that I have much more raw processing power when it comes to encoding and the likes.
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 9
8/22/05 at 8:39pm
Depending on which "stock" settings its at, the X700 usually does _around_ 2000. Overclocked, it nears the 3,000 range; unfortunately, though, there doesn't seem to be many benchmarks with the x600 or x700. As for the x600, check out this benchmark.

And isn't encoding largely a CPU intensive task?
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home