|
|
#31 |
|
I was always (15 years) big fan of desktops. And though it will never change. I went form intel DX386 through DX486, AMD K6, Penitum MMX, Pentium III, Penitum Celeron, Pentium 4. All were desktops. But year ago I need to move to another country and then when I had to take my Antec Miditower (25kg) with me to the airport I almoust died. So I bought barbone Shuttle. Man that is sweet. I putted everything form my ANtec into this small baby and have no problems.But it's still not enough for me I want go even more smaller and more mobile this is why I'm thinking about laptop. I want totaly move form desktop to laptop. I think this is the way the world is, everything is going smaller (smaller cell phones, smaller cameras etc.) Why not computers? In my opinion in future desktops will stay only as servers and maybe render farms. They will generate less heat, consume less power, it's only better for us, users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
For British Eyes Only
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Cakalak
Posts: 201
Credits: -298
![]() |
Honestly, I'm more psyched to see a final copy of OSX for Intel processors hacked and running on a PC more than Vista. I can't think of one thing about Vista that would make me want to upgrade to it....
Hmm, crippling DRM? No thanks... Doesn't play nicely with OpenGL? Pass... 'Updated' GUI? That's why I have objectdock... If anybody can name a positive new feature of Vista except shiney new icons, please, enlighten me. Merom, on the other hand, I am excited for. 64bit doesn't excite me too much because I know the performance increase for most programs is minimal at best, but that does seem to be where the industry is heading, so okay. Dual-core on the other hand, will make for a pretty nice performance increase when more programs (especially games) are multithreaded. Plus, the ability to enable both cores while plugged in and disable one while mobile gives you best of both worlds. Dual core power when you need it, and energy efficent processing when you don't. I think that will make an even bigger step to phasing out desktops (not completely, but you know...). Not to mention all the other improvements coming with Merom (more performance per watt, longer battery life, the 'next generation' of Centrino, ect.). Not to mention virtualization. I honestly can't wait for the day I can switch between various OSs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 900
Credits: 90
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Amd Turion X2 or Intel Yonah????? | devarshi84 | Notebook Forums - General | 14 | 06-02-2006 12:20 PM |
| INtel Yonah Very competitive. | Laptop<3 | Notebook Forums - General | 5 | 01-04-2006 08:09 PM |
| I couldn't wait for yonah or intel powerbooks. | Laptop<3 | Notebook Forums - General | 7 | 12-22-2005 11:18 AM |
| what are the amd counterparts to intel merom and yonah going to be? | devarshi84 | Notebook Forums - General | 6 | 10-20-2005 10:27 PM |
| Yonah (Intel Roadmap) | smilepak | Notebook Forums - General | 0 | 06-20-2005 04:34 PM |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:50 AM.









Linear Mode

