Brief Overview of UXGA and SXGA+ ... UXGA TFT Active Matrix Display The UXGA TFT (Thin Film Transistor) display provides brilliant colors and has a maximum reso ...

DeaDLoK · 12-13-2003, 03:51 PM

UXGA TFT Active Matrix Display The UXGA TFT (Thin Film Transistor) display provides brilliant colors and has a maximum resolution of 1600x1200 as compared to 1024x768 resolutions of standard 14.1" and 15.0" XGA displays. Contrast ratios are 3-5 times better than STN displays. The response times are extremely fast (50ms or less) and make live motion video come to life. The brightness on these displays are 50% better than STN displays and produce crisp, sharp images that dazzle the eyes with excitement. The viewing angle is increased with better horizontal and vertical viewing. Overall viewing area is comparable to 15” XGA panels. Information content is about 240% that of XGA displays, providing crisper images and more information.

SXGA+ TFT Active Matrix Display The SXGA+ TFT (Thin Film Transistor) display provides brilliant colors and has a maximum resolution of 1400x1050 as compared to 1024x768 resolutions of standard 14.1" and 15.0" XGA displays. Contrast ratios are 3-5 times better than STN displays. The response times are extremely fast (50ms or less) and make live motion video come to life. The brightness on these displays are 50% better than STN displays and produce crisp, sharp images that dazzle the eyes with excitement. The viewing angle is increased with better horizontal and vertical viewing. Overall viewing area is comparable to 15” XGA panels. Information content is about 170% that of XGA displays, providing crisper images and more information.

These were compared to the latest XGA panel screens not compared to each other. Enjoy and i hope this clears things up.

fs454 · 12-13-2003, 04:35 PM

50ms isnt extremely fast.
50ms is extremely slow, for gaming at least.

lol
16ms is ideal for gaming, 30ms is ok (UXGA's response)

Trailhunter · 12-13-2003, 06:33 PM

How dose the WXGA on the 4780 17" compare to the UXGA and SXGA?

litehedded · 12-13-2003, 06:37 PM

50ms is extremely slow for almost anything

fs454 · 12-13-2003, 06:43 PM

lol. I think my 233mhz P2 1024x768 max res laptop with a whopping 2mb of integrated graphics(the only laptop i have extensively used....I NEED MY 5680!) has a better response time than that.

aussie · 12-13-2003, 08:19 PM

The SXGA in my 8890 and my Samsung 193T are both 25msec response time and both have absolutely awesome colour saturation, high contrast (750:1) and wide viewing angles (170 degs H/V). I love my 8890

. And I now also love my Samsung 19" 193T DVI input SXGA

.

Sheer bliss...

AV8ing · 12-13-2003, 08:59 PM

aussie, are those the actual specs for the 16" UXGA screen in the 8890? I've been searching all over for them to no avail. It's on my extremely short list of contenders, along with the 8790 if I can get the WUXGA screen in short order.

Divine_Madcat · 12-14-2003, 02:13 AM

What UXGA specs are you looking at? The 5680's UXGA and SXGA+ are 25ms response time...

absolut_racer · 12-14-2003, 05:31 AM

Does anyone know the response time of the display on the 4080?

aussie · 12-14-2003, 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AV8ing

aussie, are those the actual specs for the 16" UXGA screen in the 8890? I've been searching all over for them to no avail. It's on my extremely short list of contenders, along with the 8790 if I can get the WUXGA screen in short order.

Not sure about the UXGA as I only have the specs on the SXGA (a Sharp LCD). There was some confusion as to which brand of UXGA LCD was being installed in the 8890.

One · 12-14-2003, 06:46 AM

So much for clearing things up...

I too, would like to know the response time of the 16" UXGA.

12-13-2003, 03:51 PM	#1
DeaDLoK P\|mPz0rz Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 237 Credits: -279	Brief Overview of UXGA and SXGA+ UXGA TFT Active Matrix Display The UXGA TFT (Thin Film Transistor) display provides brilliant colors and has a maximum resolution of 1600x1200 as compared to 1024x768 resolutions of standard 14.1" and 15.0" XGA displays. Contrast ratios are 3-5 times better than STN displays. The response times are extremely fast (50ms or less) and make live motion video come to life. The brightness on these displays are 50% better than STN displays and produce crisp, sharp images that dazzle the eyes with excitement. The viewing angle is increased with better horizontal and vertical viewing. Overall viewing area is comparable to 15” XGA panels. Information content is about 240% that of XGA displays, providing crisper images and more information. SXGA+ TFT Active Matrix Display The SXGA+ TFT (Thin Film Transistor) display provides brilliant colors and has a maximum resolution of 1400x1050 as compared to 1024x768 resolutions of standard 14.1" and 15.0" XGA displays. Contrast ratios are 3-5 times better than STN displays. The response times are extremely fast (50ms or less) and make live motion video come to life. The brightness on these displays are 50% better than STN displays and produce crisp, sharp images that dazzle the eyes with excitement. The viewing angle is increased with better horizontal and vertical viewing. Overall viewing area is comparable to 15” XGA panels. Information content is about 170% that of XGA displays, providing crisper images and more information. These were compared to the latest XGA panel screens not compared to each other. Enjoy and i hope this clears things up.

12-13-2003, 04:35 PM	#2
fs454 M170 Owner Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 840 Credits: -95	50ms isnt extremely fast. 50ms is extremely slow, for gaming at least. lol 16ms is ideal for gaming, 30ms is ok (UXGA's response) __________________ Dell XPS M170 2ghz Pentium M "Dothan" {} 2GB DDR2 RAM {} Geforce Go 7800 GTX 256mb {} 17" WUXGA LCD(Sharp, beautiful) {} 100GB SATA 5400RPM HDD {} DVD-RW Drive {} 3DMark05=Undetermined :/ Desktop: Athlon X2 4400+ at 2.5ghz {} 2GB PC3200 RAM {} eVGA 7800GTX 512mb {} Dell 2405FPW Monitor {} 300GB SATA 7200RPM {} SB X-Fi Extrememusic {} 3DMark05: 10363 Sager 5680 -\|- 3.0GHZ P4 -\|- 1GB PC3200-\|- 60GB 5400RPM HDD -\|- 15" UXGA w/MR9600 PRO...RETIRED! VerizonFios ~45mbps/5mbps

12-13-2003, 06:37 PM	#4
litehedded P.I.M.P. Productions Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Orlando, FL Posts: 877 Credits: -109	50ms is extremely slow for almost anything __________________ ____________________________________________________________ 5680 UXGA 3.2Ghz 512MB DDR400 RAM 60GB 5400 HD 802.11g and bluetooth

12-13-2003, 06:43 PM	#5
fs454 M170 Owner Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 840 Credits: -95	lol. I think my 233mhz P2 1024x768 max res laptop with a whopping 2mb of integrated graphics(the only laptop i have extensively used....I NEED MY 5680!) has a better response time than that. __________________ Dell XPS M170 2ghz Pentium M "Dothan" {} 2GB DDR2 RAM {} Geforce Go 7800 GTX 256mb {} 17" WUXGA LCD(Sharp, beautiful) {} 100GB SATA 5400RPM HDD {} DVD-RW Drive {} 3DMark05=Undetermined :/ Desktop: Athlon X2 4400+ at 2.5ghz {} 2GB PC3200 RAM {} eVGA 7800GTX 512mb {} Dell 2405FPW Monitor {} 300GB SATA 7200RPM {} SB X-Fi Extrememusic {} 3DMark05: 10363 Sager 5680 -\|- 3.0GHZ P4 -\|- 1GB PC3200-\|- 60GB 5400RPM HDD -\|- 15" UXGA w/MR9600 PRO...RETIRED! VerizonFios ~45mbps/5mbps

12-13-2003, 08:19 PM	#6
aussie down under, over easy Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Lake Macquarie, Australia (1hr north of Sydney) Posts: 3,420 Credits: 574	The SXGA in my 8890 and my Samsung 193T are both 25msec response time and both have absolutely awesome colour saturation, high contrast (750:1) and wide viewing angles (170 degs H/V). I love my 8890 . And I now also love my Samsung 19" 193T DVI input SXGA . Sheer bliss... __________________ Steve - 8890 nutter -------------------- antonov - my SXGA 8890-V XP Pro heavy lifter. mobius - my SECOND 8890 for business continuity. Sager: bigger than most, faster than all. You want a Sager? You can't handle a Sager! __________________

Notebooks For Sale

User Links

Latest Pricing

Top Posters

Todays Top Posters

Fastest Benchmarks

Latest Benchmarks

12-13-2003, 06:33 PM	#3
Trailhunter Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 10 Credits: -348	How dose the WXGA on the 4780 17" compare to the UXGA and SXGA?

12-13-2003, 08:59 PM	#7
AV8ing Bus driver Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: 39,000 feet Posts: 286 Credits: -268	aussie, are those the actual specs for the 16" UXGA screen in the 8890? I've been searching all over for them to no avail. It's on my extremely short list of contenders, along with the 8790 if I can get the WUXGA screen in short order.

12-14-2003, 02:13 AM	#8
Divine_Madcat Registered User Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 2,386 Credits: 304	What UXGA specs are you looking at? The 5680's UXGA and SXGA+ are 25ms response time...

12-14-2003, 05:31 AM	#9
absolut_racer Registered User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Austin , TX Posts: 21 Credits: -45	Does anyone know the response time of the display on the 4080?

12-14-2003, 06:46 AM	#11
One Hello, I Must Be Going Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 176 Credits: -130	So much for clearing things up... I too, would like to know the response time of the 16" UXGA.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Screen Types? UXGA, WXGA+, SXGA, SXGA+, ETC..	Inkling	Sager & Clevo Notebooks	9	03-30-2004 11:45 AM
UXGA or SXGA+	KingSnake	Notebook Forums - General	4	12-02-2003 06:04 PM
UXGA vs SXGA+	bunnyfubbles	Sager & Clevo Notebooks	20	09-01-2003 02:39 PM
SXGA vs UXGA again	aussie	Sager & Clevo Notebooks	9	08-25-2003 09:12 PM
SXGA Vs. UXGA (again)	fossil	Sager & Clevo Notebooks	3	03-13-2003 03:01 PM