There are currently 1452 people online.   Home Page  /    Forum Index
 
 
 
Notebookforums  
In order to get support, you will need to enter your login details:
Register Now Cookie?
 
Search Benchmarks Write A Review Notebook Guides Notebook Coupons
 

Notebook Research
 Laptop Reviews
 Laptop Photos
 Search Models
Ready to Purchase?
 Check Coupons
 Latest pricing
 Browse Sales
Our Community
 162,259 members
 2,773,574 posts
 Tech Support

Go Back   NotebookForums.com > Gateway Notebook Forums > Gateway Notebooks


 



alambrose
Registered User
alambrose is offline  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7
Credits: -339

  Reputation: alambrose is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!



Posted on  12-23-2007, 06:58 PM 
Digg / Save Page


Gateway ML3109 supports 667mhz FSB

I came here looking to find out if anybody knew what FSB speeds (and therefore, what processors) are supported by the Gateway ML3109, but I couldn't find the answer.

Just about all of the Gateway notebooks (including the ML3109) that use the 4006148R motherboard, are sold with processors that run at a 533mhz FSB.

I looked up the chipset (an ATI RC415MD), which according to the AMD/ATI website is a RADEON XPRESS 200 for Intel processors.

http://ati.amd.com/products/radeonxp...tel/specs.html

According to ATI, this chipset supports Pentium 4 Extreme Edition processors... if you look at the specs on the intel website for the entire line of P4 Extreme Edition processors, you'll see that none of them runs below 800mhz FSB.

Armed with this info, I decided to try installing a Core 2 Duo 2ghz 667fsb mobile processor (T7200) in the Gateway.

It worked, BIOS & Vista correctly recognized and installed the new configuration... I am writing this post on the Gateway.

So anyway, because it was such a hassle to find this info I thought I'd pass it along in case anybody else comes here looking for info about this notebook, motherboard, or chipset.

-Al




Email / Link
Reply With Quote





 

Current Laptop Deals

Price: $129.99

Price: $375.00

Price: $588.00

Price: $508.99

Price: $509.99

Price: $169.00






qhn
Registered User
qhn's Avatar qhn is offline  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,935
Credits: 4,291

  Reputation: qhn may get accused of being a paid forum member from time to time.



Posted on  12-24-2007, 06:01 AM 
Digg / Save Page


much appreciation for the effort and sharing

any adverse effects worth noting of?

cheers ...



m6805@3700; SZ71WN/C ; Macbook 2ghz/4gig/250gb/superdrive.
are u Folding@Home? - Firefox MINEFIELD - MediaPortal "the" Media Centre/HTPC!


Email / Link
Reply With Quote






alambrose
Registered User
alambrose is offline  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7
Credits: -339

  Reputation: alambrose is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!



Posted on  12-24-2007, 04:22 PM 
Digg / Save Page


No adverse effects I can see...




Email / Link
Reply With Quote






alambrose
Registered User
alambrose is offline  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7
Credits: -339

  Reputation: alambrose is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!



Posted on  12-24-2007, 11:54 PM 
Digg / Save Page


Another thing I'd like to mention...

I ran SiSoft Sandra Lite on the laptop prior to any upgrades, to try and figure out exactly what I was dealing with...

In a few different places, Sandra was identifying the chipset as an "INTEL AGTL+", this still has me a bit confused, as Sandra supposedly has support for the ATI Intel motherboard chipsets. I Googled "Intel AGTL+", and came up with a load of info, but I couldn't rely upon it, because I didn't know if Sandra was mis-identifying the chipset, which I KNOW is an ATI RC415MD.

As a side note, and this should be obvious, but anyway: Considering that AMD now owns ATI, it is quite doubtful that anyone could expect anything more than perfunctory support for their Intel supported ATI chipsets, at least from AMD, 'nuff said!

Another user here (Syrtus) that I have had a few emails with, revealed that his ML3109 recognized more than the [advertised] max of 2gb RAM (but less than the 4gb he installed). Indeed, the ATI specs claim a max RAM of 4gb! So where is the truth???

I have not had a chance to check this out myself, so I am speculating here... however: The ML3109 reserves a portion of UMA for video. So the BIOS reports RAM remaining after allocations for UMA... I have heard from a few places, that the limiting factor in this low-end laptop is the video. So if the BIOS is set to "AUTO" for video UMA; then maybe 4gb are recognized, but are reported as less in the POST due to UMA allocations? Again, I am speculating, but according to Syrtus more than 2gb but less than 4gb is recognized by this laptop.

Now to throw everything completely out the window...

In terms of real-world-usage...

I upgraded the processor in my Gateway ML3109 from the stock Pentium Celeron-M 1.6 SL9WT mobile 533mhz FSB 1mb cache processor to a Intel Pentium Core 2 Duo T7200 SL9SF 667mhz FSB with 4mb cache.

I paid $195.00 for the processor (used), the old processor may fetch $10-$30 on Ebay... worst case; I paid $185 for the upgrade. However the laptop was a buy at under $400 some time ago at BestBuy... A laptop with a T7200 processor, even now, is usually priced over the $1k mark, as the processor alone still commands a price over $250.

But again, getting back to REAL WORLD experiences... is it worth your time and effort to do this upgrade? First, let me say that computers are my hobby... not my job... The amount of time and effort spent researching components and drivers and bios settings, cannot be compensated... I have a great job with a 6-figure salary, and the time I spend doing this crap is strictly recreational... Realistically, the amount of time I spent on this upgrade, would have garnered me several thousand dollars at work!

In the end, I have to ask myself the question... am I doing this because I NEED TO, or because I WANT TO??

Now I expect that the audience here is mostly guys... so all I would ask is that before you undertake any project, consider the value of your time.

When I pass away, and I am given the opportunity to view the entirety of my life in a few flickering seconds, I hope that I can say that the bulk of my life was not spent staring at a computer screen!




Email / Link
Reply With Quote






qhn
Registered User
qhn's Avatar qhn is offline  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,935
Credits: 4,291

  Reputation: qhn may get accused of being a paid forum member from time to time.



Posted on  12-25-2007, 05:03 AM 
Digg / Save Page


Quote:
Originally Posted by alambrose View Post
.... so all I would ask is that before you undertake any project, consider the value of your time...
and gals, and
u r not alone in the department of tinkling with one's "toys" - curiosity, learning and pushing the performance envelop are quite contagious and addicting

merry holliday seasons

cheers ...



m6805@3700; SZ71WN/C ; Macbook 2ghz/4gig/250gb/superdrive.
are u Folding@Home? - Firefox MINEFIELD - MediaPortal "the" Media Centre/HTPC!


Email / Link
Reply With Quote






syrtus
Registered User
syrtus is offline  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 32
Credits: -298

  Reputation: syrtus is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!



Posted on  12-29-2007, 05:42 PM 
Digg / Save Page


a follow up.

I took a similar approach to Al. However I went a bit different & did not run down the FSB enough. so I upgraded to a T2450, a 2.0 Ghz 32bit dual core cpu, 533 FSB. Performance is good, snappy. $85 from ebay.

I put in 4 Gigs of 667 ram ( 2 x 2gb Gskill 667 ddr2 pc5300 )

result: a very snappy little notebook. paid $359 back in the summer from bestbuy locally after a $40 local coupon.

anyway, put 4 gigs ram in.

VISTA reports 2.88 GB

Graphics.. total available GM 1023

dedicated 128 MB

shared system 895 MB

display driver version 8.341.0.0

For me this was more of a hobby thing, done in the evenings, as relaxation. Over all pretty cost effective.

$359 for NB. $85 for cpu. $70 for RAM. $ 48 for a dual layer DVD burner & another $50 for shipping, tax, cpu thermal grease & maybe 4 hrs in total tinker time.

comparable function notebooks ? $800-1200.

did not count 3 OS reformats & another 2 HD/OS swaps .

Over all, I considered it a quite good outcome for money spent.

in the end I went to another laptop with 17" screen & number pad on the keyboard, because of business use & accounting things.

The 2 laptops I bought & worked on, this past yr were the first computers, I did not build from MB up in the past 15 yrs.

one can easily guess the other from my other posts.




Email / Link
Reply With Quote






denb45
Registered User
denb45's Avatar denb45 is offline  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 875
Credits: 1,931

  Reputation: denb45 is down to zero points and better do some kissing up or something.



Posted on  12-29-2007, 06:18 PM 
Digg / Save Page


Quote:
Originally Posted by syrtus View Post
a follow up.

I took a similar approach to Al. However I went a bit different & did not run down the FSB enough. so I upgraded to a T2450, a 2.0 Ghz 32bit dual core cpu, 533 FSB. Performance is good, snappy. $85 from ebay.

I put in 4 Gigs of 667 ram ( 2 x 2gb Gskill 667 ddr2 pc5300 )

result: a very snappy little notebook. paid $359 back in the summer from bestbuy locally after a $40 local coupon.

anyway, put 4 gigs ram in.

VISTA reports 2.88 GB

Graphics.. total available GM 1023

dedicated 128 MB

shared system 895 MB

display driver version 8.341.0.0

For me this was more of a hobby thing, done in the evenings, as relaxation. Over all pretty cost effective.

$359 for NB. $85 for cpu. $70 for RAM. $ 48 for a dual layer DVD burner & another $50 for shipping, tax, cpu thermal grease & maybe 4 hrs in total tinker time.

comparable function notebooks ? $800-1200.

did not count 3 OS reformats & another 2 HD/OS swaps .

Over all, I considered it a quite good outcome for money spent.

in the end I went to another laptop with 17" screen & number pad on the keyboard, because of business use & accounting things.

The 2 laptops I bought & worked on, this past yr were the first computers, I did not build from MB up in the past 15 yrs.

one can easily guess the other from my other posts.
You do realize that in a bout 3 to 4 months, you will have to re-do the thermal paste,(Artic Sliver) on the CPU & Heatsink fan, if you don't it will dry-up and you will have overheating issues, you may not notice any issues right now, but you will, if this isn't done every few months However, if you used the CPU's OEM supplied Thermal Pad, (like the pre-built OEM's do) then this WON'T HAPPEN, If you didn't go this route, I'd find a OEM Thermal Pad, if I were you?........I use to build PC's, but, Stopped doing it, I found it way too costly, and a lot cheaper just to buy a OEM pre-built one off the Store Shelf................anyway, Good luck w/ that upgraded notebook



Gateway MX6453 * AMD X 2 Duo Core 64 Mobile 1.6GHz * ATI RADEON XPRESS 1150 Graphics * HITACHI Travelstar 7K100 100GB 7200 RPM 8MB Cache * 3GB*667MHz*DDR2 Memory*Creative Audigy 2Z Notebook PCMCIA Slot Sound Card * Vista Ultimate 32/64 Bit Full Retail w/ SP1 * MCE 2005 w/ SP3

Last edited by denb45 : 12-29-2007 at 06:32 PM.


Email / Link
Reply With Quote






syrtus
Registered User
syrtus is offline  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 32
Credits: -298

  Reputation: syrtus is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!



Posted on  12-29-2007, 08:08 PM 
Digg / Save Page


thanks denb45

however I predate use of thermal paste. anyway, both notebooks I replaced cpus in used some type of paste, not pads.

pads were used for the GPUs & as the 2 NB were new, I just used the same GPU pads.

cpu temps are about 10dC cooler after the upgrades. other one used a T5300 from a T2080.

PS: I am a reincarnatd desktop OC'er that used to make his own thermal material from copper & old silver coins.

went thru mating cpu & heat sink surfaces with valve honing cpd, etc, etc.

happy new year.




Email / Link
Reply With Quote






denb45
Registered User
denb45's Avatar denb45 is offline  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 875
Credits: 1,931

  Reputation: denb45 is down to zero points and better do some kissing up or something.



Posted on  12-29-2007, 08:36 PM 
Digg / Save Page


Quote:
Originally Posted by syrtus View Post
thanks denb45



pads were used for the GPUs & as the 2 NB were new, I just used the same GPU pads.



happy new year.
Yeah, a lot easier that way, I really hated having to re-do Thermal Paste, so, the last Desktop Build I did, I also used the OEM GPU Pads, forget the Thermal Paste, it's a pain-in-the-ass



Gateway MX6453 * AMD X 2 Duo Core 64 Mobile 1.6GHz * ATI RADEON XPRESS 1150 Graphics * HITACHI Travelstar 7K100 100GB 7200 RPM 8MB Cache * 3GB*667MHz*DDR2 Memory*Creative Audigy 2Z Notebook PCMCIA Slot Sound Card * Vista Ultimate 32/64 Bit Full Retail w/ SP1 * MCE 2005 w/ SP3


Email / Link
Reply With Quote






Bryan'sM505x
Registered User
Bryan'sM505x's Avatar Bryan'sM505x is offline  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 830
Credits: 529

  Reputation: Bryan'sM505x is down to zero points and better do some kissing up or something.



Posted on  01-02-2008, 02:04 AM 
Digg / Save Page


Awesome! I still have my ML3109 (just bought a T1616) and was thinking about upgrading the processor to a T5500 C2D... Is the battery life better now? the Celeron M only lasted less than 2 hours with the supplied 6 cell battery. Cheers!



Everyday Lappy: Gateway M-6864FX C2D T5750 2.0ghz 15.4" WXGA 4gb ram, ATI 2600HD 512mb
Upgraded BLU RAY- DVD/RW Drive

Gaming Notebook: Gateway P-6831FX NVIDIA 8800GTS w/ First Blu Ray Drive Upgrade *Sold

Work Lappy: Dell XPS M1730 T7700 2.4ghz 4gb ram 17" WXUGA C2D Nviida 8700GT 512ram

Desktop: Alienware Area 51 7500 Conspiracy Blue E6600 C2D 2.4ghz 3GB DVDRW, 320GB HD, Nvidia 8800GTS 320GB DX 10, X-Fi™ XtremeGamer 7.1 Audio, 22" Samsung LCD.


Email / Link
Reply With Quote






syrtus
Registered User
syrtus is offline  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 32
Credits: -298

  Reputation: syrtus is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!



Posted on  01-02-2008, 07:00 PM 
Digg / Save Page


hey bryan,

got no change in battery life. cpu temps run about 5dF cooler.

you can also go to a t2450, 2.g fastest 556fsb core duo (cheapest)

the t2450 is about 95% as fast as a t7200/t5500 & costs 1/3 as much, $90 vrs $300.

one still has the slow integrated video with no upgrade path.

also a cpu upgrade in the ml3109 requires near 100% disassembly & reassembly of the notebook.

happy new year & good luck




Email / Link
Reply With Quote






mhutch
Registered User
mhutch is offline  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Credits: -230

  Reputation: mhutch is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!



Posted on  02-03-2008, 05:24 PM 
Digg / Save Page


I also have an ML3109 that I'd like to upgrade the CPU on. I have the CPU in hand (T2450) but am stuck trying to disassemble the laptop.

I removed all the obvious screws, but the rear of the laptop is still stuck together.

Can someone who has done this provide me a clue as to how the case comes apart? Preferably without damaging it




Email / Link
Reply With Quote