Notebookforums
 
 Home 
       
 Forums 
 
 Guides 
   
Old 10-04-2004, 12:00 PM   #1
coolguy_y
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8
Credits: -346
 
coolguy_y is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
And wheres the best place to buy this if I am from Canada? (cheapest)
coolguy_y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 07:25 PM   #2
RGhost
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 56
Credits: -323
 
RGhost is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
Thanks. Great thread. If i were gettign the 3790 i'd go for the ultra just for the extra real estate. (I can read small) Both screens are gettting excellent reviews.

Not to hijack the topic of this thread, but are these becnhmark scores good? What would be "average numbers"
RGhost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2004, 01:21 AM   #3
Valkryst
plz no dead pixles plz!

Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 196
Credits: -281
 
Valkryst is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
good for a laptop, average for a desktop.
Valkryst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2004, 04:14 PM   #4
INTP
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 22
Credits: -343
 
INTP is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
John, which screen would you say looks better while gaming at 1024x768?
INTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 12:21 PM   #5
John
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 379
Credits: 182
 
John is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
All we tried was Doom3 but the wuxga looked a little better.
__________________
m1710 T7600, 7950 GTX, 4G, 200G 7200, LG, Optiarc, 4965
2405fpw

3790 screen pics
3790 wsxga wuxga side-by-side pics
John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 07:05 PM   #6
One
Hello, I Must Be Going

Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 176
Credits: -163
 
One is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
I have no reason not to believe you, John, when you say that the WSXGA looks a bit more vibrant than the WUXGA in person, and I know that photos aren't always the best reference for determining this - "in person" is the best way to see it.

But when looking at your photos, I guess I have to take the road less traveled, because to me, in your photos the WUXGA on the right looks better to my eyes.

The WSXGA on the left is the one that looks like it's a tad bit milky and washed out in several of the photos, whereas the WUXGA is the one that looks more vibrant to me - the colors seem to be deeper, richer. Not in every photo, but in several, especially in the doom picture.

I can see a difference in the whites - the WSXGA whites look a bit whiter in some cases, and in others the WUXGA seems a bit whiter. Just too hard to get an accurate feel with photos. But overall, the WUXGA just looks a bit better to me. Both screens appear to be at the exact same angle, so I couldn't blame any discrepancies in screen quality on that factor when looking at these pictures. Maybe lighting could have played a factor here when you were snapping some of the pictures, but clearly not in all.

Each to his own. I prefer UXGA myself, so that's what I'll be waiting for with the system I'm interested in.

Thanks a lot for snapping all those pictures. At the very least, they serve as a great reference for the difference in resolutions.


Last edited by One; 10-11-2004 at 07:24 PM.
One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 09:04 PM   #7
John
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 379
Credits: 182
 
John is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
Quote:
Originally Posted by One
I have no reason not to believe you, John, when you say that the WSXGA looks a bit more vibrant than the WUXGA in person, and I know that photos aren't always the best reference for determining this - "in person" is the best way to see it.

But when looking at your photos, I guess I have to take the road less traveled, because to me, in your photos the WUXGA on the right looks better to my eyes.

The WSXGA on the left is the one that looks like it's a tad bit milky and washed out in several of the photos, whereas the WUXGA is the one that looks more vibrant to me - the colors seem to be deeper, richer. Not in every photo, but in several, especially in the doom picture.

I can see a difference in the whites - the WSXGA whites look a bit whiter in some cases, and in others the WUXGA seems a bit whiter. Just too hard to get an accurate feel with photos. But overall, the WUXGA just looks a bit better to me. Both screens appear to be at the exact same angle, so I couldn't blame any discrepancies in screen quality on that factor when looking at these pictures. Maybe lighting could have played a factor here when you were snapping some of the pictures, but clearly not in all.

Each to his own. I prefer UXGA myself, so that's what I'll be waiting for with the system I'm interested in.

Thanks a lot for snapping all those pictures. At the very least, they serve as a great reference for the difference in resolutions.

That's what the pics are for One, to try to help you figure out which one is best for you. You are correct in the Doom pic, which is why I said it looks better in wuxga. I don't think this is attributed to the lighting, probably because of the screen brightness difference. In a couple pics such as this one:

the white out or milkiness can be attributed to reflection.

Take a close look at the photoshop photo and especially the objects on the right hand side of the photo. This may give you a better indication of the difference in colorfulness/vibrance.
__________________
m1710 T7600, 7950 GTX, 4G, 200G 7200, LG, Optiarc, 4965
2405fpw

3790 screen pics
3790 wsxga wuxga side-by-side pics
John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 07:23 PM   #8
slaflamme
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Port Charlotte, FL
Posts: 108
Credits: -300
 
slaflamme is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
Just got my baby today, and is she ever sexy. Wooowe. I, for one, am glad I did not get the WUXGA. The icons and the text are so small I absolutely have to wear my reading glasses. Reading the forum is not much trouble, font size is good. However, other things in other programs are very very small.
My 2 cents worth is this: If you've got great/perfect vision, and you are not going to be up all night infront of the screen, go for the WUXGA. Otherwise, save a few bucks and get this gorgeous WSXGA screen. No poking, no dead pixels, no light seepage. Just a picture perfect screen.
Now I'm going to go change my sig.
__________________
Here's to no dead pixels:




My machine-3yrs+ and still running great:
Sager 3790l WSXGA l 1.7Ghz Dothan l 1024MB 2-333 DDR l Radeon 9700 Mobility 128MB l 60GB 7200RPM l WiFi l Bluetooth l 8x dvd/24x cdrw combo l 12 cell battery l Car adapter l 1 year shipping coverage l $1996 at PCTorque l Shinza sleeve at Shinza. com l
slaflamme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 08:15 PM   #9
thestateimin
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 264
Credits: -240
 
thestateimin is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
I'm jealous now! Congrats on your dream machine flamme.

I'm still contemplating whether or not I should get the WSXGA or the WUXGA.
thestateimin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 08:30 PM   #10
slaflamme
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Port Charlotte, FL
Posts: 108
Credits: -300
 
slaflamme is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
Thanks, and good luck on your decision. It really is a personal choice. It took me 2 months to decide, and it was John's pictures comparing the two that helped me choose.
__________________
Here's to no dead pixels:




My machine-3yrs+ and still running great:
Sager 3790l WSXGA l 1.7Ghz Dothan l 1024MB 2-333 DDR l Radeon 9700 Mobility 128MB l 60GB 7200RPM l WiFi l Bluetooth l 8x dvd/24x cdrw combo l 12 cell battery l Car adapter l 1 year shipping coverage l $1996 at PCTorque l Shinza sleeve at Shinza. com l
slaflamme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2004, 01:27 AM   #11
prophecy
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 83
Credits: -308
 
prophecy is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
awesome post John! Looks like the wuxga is quite a bit nicer if you're eyes can take the small res hey?
prophecy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2004, 09:40 PM   #12
SheepFactory
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 49
Credits: -334
 
SheepFactory is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
what is the max resolution on WSXGA?
SheepFactory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2004, 08:50 PM   #13
h00ligan
Registered User
 
h00ligan's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: hot
Posts: 915
Credits: 107
 
h00ligan is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
how's the heat under the left palmrest for you?
__________________
Lenovi T60
Macbook Pro
Athlon 2500+ ~ 1 TB in RAID 5 200 gig boot drive ~ server
h00ligan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2005, 02:20 PM   #14
HahaKakashi
NEWBIE

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: IA
Posts: 42
Credits: -137
 
HahaKakashi is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
how about the battery life on both? Will the WUXGA consume more?
HahaKakashi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2005, 05:36 PM   #15
HahaKakashi
NEWBIE

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: IA
Posts: 42
Credits: -137
 
HahaKakashi is a n00b, but everyone loves n00bs!
bump ehheeee
HahaKakashi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WUXGA vs. WXGA side by side weston Dell Home (Inspiron, XPS, Studio) 14 07-18-2005 07:41 PM
Eyes of the beholder: 9300 LG vs Samsung side-by-side dct3178 Dell Home (Inspiron, XPS, Studio) 16 04-01-2005 03:41 PM
Anyone with pics of s7010 and s6210 side by side? comrade Notebook Forums - General 0 08-13-2004 05:15 PM
Request: Side By Side pics of SXGA/UXGA Killafornia Sager & Clevo Notebooks 14 07-30-2003 06:47 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001-2009 NotebookForums LLC