You are browsing within the review sections of our forums. Content within these sections reflect consumer opinions of laptops. Our admins take the best and most objective laptop reviews and index them here to create a distinct selection of quality reviews with averaged overall ratings. Many of these reviews have benchmarks attached to them which allows for users to compare their laptop's performance with others, and ultimately enables us to provide a sortable list which at a glance show the fastest laptops amongst a variety of applications (gaming, video editing, web browsing, etc...). Help us build a better laptop database by submitting your laptop review.

Well to be honest with you, the ability to view HDTV is not a priority for me. I'd prefer the WUXGA screen simply because I believe the picture in dvds and TV would be better than with WXGA+. Also, I have noticed that as technology progresses resolutions go up. As I'm buying this notebook as my only computer and as I'm not going to buy a new laptop until 5-7 years from now, I want a notebook that is as futureproof as possible.

I'd think that WXGA+ would be better in gaming because newer games demand so much power that it's hard to run games in WUXGA with a notebook. But as I'd play only a couple of hours a week, and mainly Half-Life 2, WUXGA might not be a problem for me.

Belch, sorry but I'll remind you again so you won't forget: Please tell me the language of the included programs such as the dvdplaybackprogram and Photshop. The reason I ask is that if I buy the m4438g in Sweden and buy WindowsXP (finnish version) in Finland, I don't wanna be surprised and find out that all the included programs are in Swedish.

Hi all!
I'm just dither between the m4438 and m3438. For Office and Internet applications which I use most (99%), I'm sure the m4438 screen does better fit. I find the icons ond font in 1440x900 on a 17" screen too big, but 1920x1280 seems to be too small. So I'd like to use 1600x1200 or something equal. On a Dell screnn I saw that the interpolated 1600x1200 looks not too bad. What about the m4438?

For the 1% gaming a smooth game speed is much more important for me than a high resolution. So is a screen interpolated down to 1440x900 or ~1280x800 are really so bad or unplayable in games?

@John: If you plan to buy the NB in 2-3 month stay cool with that language question. There is enough time for things to happen. :-)
First: The FSC hotline sometimes is not very competent. For example a few weeks ago they told that for their handheld loox 720 there will be no update to win mobile 2005 available. But meanwhile it's officially announced that there will be one. So it's absolutely not sure, that the m4438 will not be sold in finnland.
Second: I'm sure the NB will be sold in UK, so you could buy it from an online shop there. With englich OS you will not have any problems I think.
Third: If you spend 2000 Euro for a NB and want to use it the next 4-5 years the extra money for finish windows will not be such a big problem, will it? ;-)

OpaJo

First. The program delivered are multilingual. At least as far as I can see. For example Nero, Liquid View, the optional Adobe Elements. Drivers and Utilities such as Powercinema provided on www.fujitsu-siemens.com are of course multilingual. That means they are all in English.

Second. I use downscaled resolution when playing several games. I believe it looks great. I have no problems with it. For example Battlefield 2. I will test some further with other games. But right now Im afk from my M4438G due to buisness travel. I will get back to it in a week or soo. But of course I can answer questions anyway, but no test right now.

Third: The DDR memory. I havent counted the pins, sorry Maybe I can figure it out when Im back.

Right you are, I think I need to have patience in this thing. And you know when I browse through the net it seems like M4438G is very rare in other countries as well. I could only find one online shop (from Sweden) which sold this notebook. Wow!

Well I'm studying English in a university now so I don't think an English OS would be a problem. Still, I'd prefer a Finnish OS but I guess an Eglish OS will do just fine.

Let's assume that I'd order the M4438G from Sweden or England, there are problems. Sweden: are the included programs (Elements 3.0, dvdplayback et cetera) in Swedish or in English. If they are in Swedish then that's a definate problem for me because I have no interest in buying Elements 3.0 as a Finnish version (since I have buy the OS as well). England: OK, the language is not a problem (obviously) but there might be two problems: 1) the mains cord (plug) is not compatible with Finnish outlets. I'm told that that is not really a problem since there's adapters and such but still, I'd like to have a Finnish type mains cord. 2) the keyboard layout. An acquaintance of mine told me that if I buy the notebook from Sweden the kayboard layout is same as in Finland. That got me thinking: I don't think the layout is the same in English NBs. That could be a problem as well.

Anyway, I'll wait for 2 months and then decide what to do. In the meantime, I'd appreciate it if Belch could tell me what language the included programs are (Photoshop, dvdplayback et cetera). Also, Belch bought a PM-760 version of the M4438G but I couldn't find that version, only a PM-750 versio. So I'd appreciate if Belch could tell the name of the Swedish shop that he bought this notebook from. Or maybe a online shop that sells PM760 or PM770 versions of M4438G.

Right now, the best that we have in Finland is M3438G with PM-750. This NB costs a little under 2000 euros. I'd hate to have to buy this NB since I really need at least PM-760 (preferably PM-770) and that WUXGA display (since I'm not a hardcore gamer and since I'd be using this notebook for light picture editing and viewing movies and such).

EDIT: Thank you Belch for the answer (the language question)!

Okey, are you ready guys? I have big news! Amilo M3438G's display has got 16ms:n response time, Amilo M4438G's display has got 25ms:n response time. I repeat, M4438G has got 25 ms:n response time! This info is not 100% fact but I guy I know told me so. He had read that on Fujitsu Siemens website.

I might be buying the M3438G after all because let's look at the downsides of M4438G and its WUXGA display. 1) You won't be able to play newer games in its native resolution (soon) so you will have to scale down which affects the picture quality. 2) the 25ms:n response time sucks, especially in FPS.

So I know that 25ms:n response time does not mean that for example Half-Life 2 is unplayable. Eizo is a very respected displaymanufacturer and many of its displays have got 25ms:n response time. That being said, nowadays they are selling displays with as low as 4 ms:n response time, so 25ms:n display is kinda obsolete.

So which is more important WUXGA resolution or good response time. For me, I guess it's good response time, since I have my own hometheatre already and while I'd use my laptop as a TV from time to time, a good response time is still a must for me.

So I guess I'll be buying the M3438G then. If only they would release the PM760 and PM770 models in Finland already. They are only selling PM740 and PM750 models.

Heh, welcome to the club then (still waiting mine)

I admit it, 25 ms does sound pretty bad, but then again didn't Belch say something like "no ghosting at all" and I have read some comp articles that state that the official response time given doesn't always give the real story about the actual performance of the screen.

Just FYI so your decision won't be too easy...

Hi, I have a little "problem" with my wxga fujitsu; When I put the brightness in the lower level the screen flickers; this is very apparent in a dark room and with a solid color background (fsc_swans, the default wallpaper).

In other way, my screen have no "ghost"; I play at hl2, San Andreas, Doon3 and NFS underground.

Despite this flicker problem, I think this screen is by far better than my 9300 wuxga.

It's a shame that fujitsu-siemens don't sell the wuxga version in Spain, at least for the time being.

This info is in the M4438 datasheet:
I'm not experienced in TFT displays. 25 ms means 40 fps, right? Is this too slow for games and movies? I've read somewhere that 25 fps are enough for a smooth tft display

FPS is not related to response time.

Yes, ok, in other words:
If you have a game that the NB (cpu/gpu power) can't display with more then 30 fps, then the 25 ms don't play any role, right?
On the other hand, if the NB can display a game with more than 40 fps, then you will recognize a slow down caused by the 25 ms response time.
Is this correct?
Now the question is: are 30-40 fps enough for a smooth game on tft display? And if so, can you slow down the NB to not display more than 40 fps?

I can assure you that the Fujitsu WUXGA is abolutely wonderful to play with, even in lower resolutions than 1920x1200. And NO ghosting. I also believe the WXGA is very good for games, but with the 6800Go the max resolution (1440x900) can be a bit low sometimes. (I have only seen the WXGA on Amilo M1425 but I can easily see what happens with that screen on the 4438G)

I wonder if anyone would open his/her shiny notebook to verify that Fujitsu doesn't solder the cpu to mainboard.

If this notebook can be pinmodded like dell 9300, fujitsu will have one more customer.

Excuse my lack of knowledge on the matter, but what kind of a operation would this pinmodding be and what would you gain from it?

I should have mine soon so you'd better answer, no?

I wanted to compare M4438G's display specs to another notebook's display, especially to a notebook that is a great gaming notebook. Well, almost everybody thinks of Dell XPS Gen2 as a great gaming notebook and it has a 17" WUXGA display. I tried to find the response time of this display and it was difficult but I managed to find in some forum: XPS Gen2's display is by Samsung and the response time is the same as M4438G's response time: 25 ms. So in that respect, 25ms can't be all bad even if some displays nowadays have as low as 4ms response time.

Errrmmm, pin modding means:
1) You take your original cpu out. Your original cpu is a 533MHz FSB. (730, 740, 750, 760, 770)
2) Put in a 400MHz FSB dothan cpu (725, 735, 745, ...).
3) And you put a tiny wire in cpu socket to connect 2 pins together. The chipset is fooled that the new cpu is a 533MHz type, not 400MHz.

For example:
A dothan 725 cpu: 100MHz FSB x 16 multiplier = 1600MHz
725 pin modded: 133MHz FSB x 16 = 2133MHz
735 pin modded: 133 x 17 = 2266Mhz

You can sell your original cpu or insert it to your desktop computer. You saved some money for not buying expensive top-rated cpu but cheap low-end cpu (but run >= top-end type).

To be able to pin mod, your cpu must not be soldered to mainboard

A pin mod picture here:
http://www.notebookforums.com/showthread.php?t=80879

Dell users are pin modding for some time, but i'm hesitate to join because i hate the light leakage of 9300/xps 2.