|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 71
Credits: -330
![]() |
Benchmarks: Asus Z71V 3DMARK03 Scores only!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Just kinda curious how come your not running 3dmark05?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Adios!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,251
Credits: 0
![]() |
Hey, why not?
Stock speeds (250/500): ![]() Overclocked (300/600): Keep in mind, nothing else is overclocked. These were all run at 1024x768 on the default settings. I'm curious though... I'm going to try running them at the native 1680x1050 resolution. ![]() EDIT: Ha, at 1680x1050, I got 2720 stock speeds, and 3138 overclocked to 300/600. Last edited by Redmumba; 07-03-2005 at 04:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Filthy Canadian :)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 924
Credits: -107
![]() |
How does a guy with a 1.4 GHz Pentium M beat one with a 1.86 GHz Pentium M? Two guys, actually, I think - I'll double-check my scores once I'm done calibrating my battery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 71
Credits: -330
![]() |
actually mine was a 1.4 Celeron 1MB cache cpu... :s i think 2003 is more approptiate and i don't feel like installing a 150MB+ program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Filthy Canadian :)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 924
Credits: -107
![]() |
A 1.4 Celeron beating a 1.86 Pentium M with stock video settings? O_O
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Filthy Canadian :)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 924
Credits: -107
![]() |
Silly of me. Didn't notice that you had overclocked.
Interesting, though - the cache only seems to make enough difference to help when the graphics card's power increases. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Adios!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,251
Credits: 0
![]() |
We were doing the graphics tests--not the CPU tests. In the Game Demos 1-4, the emphasis is on the graphics card, not the processor.
I don't understand how you got a higher score for the stocked settings, but I got a higher score with the same overclocked settings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Adios!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,251
Credits: 0
![]() |
Keep in mind, overclocking my processor would put it at 2.4ghz. O:-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 71
Credits: -330
![]() |
Quote:
unfortunately.. plus you have a prebuilt book ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Filthy Canadian :)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 924
Credits: -107
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 71
Credits: -330
![]() |
do this.....
go to your graphics settings and do the following 1. turn off antialiasing(tick off application controlled first) 2. turn off anisotropic(tick off application controlled first) 3. setting image setting to high performance rather than high quality 4. turn vert sync off (tick off application controlled first) once you do these things run the benchmark aagain and see what results you will get. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| X1400 3DMark03 scores | Barracuda | Dell Business (Vostro, Latitude, Precision) | 4 | 06-29-2006 01:21 AM |
| i9200 3DMark03 scores | alexrud | Dell Notebook Reviews | 32 | 04-01-2005 07:50 PM |
| Area51m 3DMark03 scores?? | Z_is_Me | Alienware Notebook Benchmarks | 2 | 11-11-2004 09:20 PM |
| Very bad 3dmark03 scores.. | Nicknitro25 | Alienware Notebook Benchmarks | 11 | 11-08-2004 12:06 AM |
| Low 3dmark03 Scores on 9100 | duckhunter-deux | Dell Legacy (single-core notebooks) | 8 | 09-16-2004 05:12 PM |